What is the future of US-Ukraine relations? Vasyl Shevtsov. Synopsis.

Both the US and Europe will certainly support Ukraine. The US – for the sake of dominance, and Europe – for the sake of even survival. For Ukraine, at this stage of its development, US patronage is useful because we have common interests in the region.

I don’t really like listening to Vasyl Shevtsov, because he always starts with a broad context for a long time. I don’t agree with him on everything. For some reason, I accidentally listened to his entire broadcast and I want to highlight the points that are interesting for the topic of the site.

The root causes of the current war

The ongoing war is part of a larger war for resources in a new, “post-industrial^[1]” formation, which Mr Vasyl calls the information war. According to his analysis, some of the key materials and resources necessary for survival and dominance in the new formation are available, in particular, in Ukraine and Russia. The United States (lack of rare earth elements) and China (lack of energy resources) are competing for them.

While the United States is the leader in technology and media, China is nipping at its heels and threatening to take over. Mr Vasyl notes that this level of competition is not just between the US and China, but between the White and Yellow races, and makes a relevant excursion, which is not important here, except for one interesting point for me : The White race relies more on the mind, and the Yellow race relies more on the heart. I immediately recall the teachings of Jesus on the Cross: “God is Love.” I tie a knot as a memento.

Like Alakha Niranjan in his conversations, Vasyl emphasises that Trump represents the forces that want to preserve the status quo of the past era, the dominance of technology. But Trump is supported by the forces that see the future in globalisation and, through it, in solving problems^[2] that can only be solved by a co-operative global community. This is, of course, about Elon Musk and those who stand behind him. And this community desperately needs the resources that will enable the functioning of effective artificial intelligence and information processing tools, such as quantum computers.

Globalisation and local stabilisation

The team of globalists obviously wants to create something like the Chinese digital society, where people are not able to act of their own free will. Sooner or later, in the process of resistance, this will lead to resistance through guerrilla (terrorist) movements. Huge entities, such as megacities, are extremely vulnerable to terrorist and natural climate impacts due to their critical dependence on energy, water, transport, sewage and waste management, etc., so guerrilla warfare can be effective. As a result of resistance to the process of “digital society”, there will be a counterprocess of fragmentation of social groups, transition to autonomous means of subsistence, but with the benefits of global technologies. (This process has been going on for a long time, and became very evident during the bombing of Kyiv and other large cities – my note)

Whose resources? Who are the guests?

China de facto already owns Russia’s resources, and from the Far East to the Urals, Russia is not perceived as an independent country. What does America have left? It has Ukraine. Because America is not eager to engage in direct confrontation with China, and China does not seem to be eager to fight. That is why Ukraine is the trump card for the United States as a resource (materials and natural intellectual potential) base for future dominance in the information formation.

Therefore, whatever Trump’s moves, the US interest is definitely in Ukraine, and this is very good for us, because we ourselves are not yet capable of mastering the resources we have, either technologically or organisationally. (I agree with Vasyl Shevtsov and Danylo Yanevsky on this. Elites that are not ready for their own sovereignty will be ruled by other elites. God willing, not the Moscow elites.)

Europe also lacks its own resources. Both natural and human, despite its huge population. Therefore, Ukraine is necessarily in the focus of European interests. It is a matter of survival. Both in resource and military terms (This also correlates with the conclusions of Alakha Niranjan in his analysis and forecast for 2025. And not only his – my note).

Plato on the states of society.

By the way. Mr Vasyl explains the global process of transition to an information (post-industrial, post-technological) formation from the point of view of Plato, his work The Republic, which reveals the features of human types (sages, warriors, managers). Vedic and yogic sources explain the same thing. If you don’t like Vedic sources and principles, you are welcome to read Plato. European (ha-ha) thought!

Conclusions.

Both the United States and Europe will certainly support Ukraine. The US – for the sake of dominance, and Europe – for the sake of even survival. For Ukraine, at this stage of its development, US patronage is useful because we have common interests in the region. Although it’s a shame that we are without a kebeta, this is the way things are. We are drawing conclusions and developing. We have recipes!

The fuss and nonsense in politicians’ statements is an integral part of the processes of 2025 – see the forecast again. Poorly educated and uncultured people are in power all around. But that’s okay. They will learn. As long as they don’t learn from our lives. Or perhaps a new era of open hearts is beginning? With such short trousers… with a nuclear button.

Vasyl Shevtsov provided an excellent analysis from the point of view of the struggle for resources, that is, from the point of view of the survival of countries as seen by their elites.

The global tambourine dancing continues from the position of instincts, without turning on awareness, which in extreme cases can lead to rapid self-destruction. It is difficult to prevent this, as the elites have their own beliefs and teachers. And we continue to inform about the alternative: a society built on the principles of knowledge about man.

1. I put it in quotes because there are many meanings of this term. For now, I’m using it as a time reference point. ↑
2. Musk knows something (?) when he invests huge resources in interplanetary flights. I am aware of the statements of a well-known representative of Indian yogic authorities who warns that the Earth will be uninhabitable for humans in a few hundred years and that space travel will probably be able to save humanity. I can’t speak for Musk, I don’t know him. But I suspect that the question is about future funds. Big money and power. ↑